Case against rugby player withdrawn

Rape allegation hurt Blue Bulls sportsman’s career

Image: Deneesha Pillay

A case of rape against Blue Bulls contract player Khwezi Mafu was formally withdrawn on Tuesday, but the allegations came at a great cost to his rugby career.

Magistrate Kenny Cooney told Mafu, 20, that he was free to go after the state struck the matter from the court roll.

Prosecutor Kenny van Biljon had told the Port Elizabeth Regional Court that he had been unable to trace a key state witness, with whom he needed to consult, and therefore could not proceed with the matter at this stage.

But while Mafu walked out of court a free man, the state continues to hold the reins and can place the matter back on the court roll at a later stage.

However, until such time – if it ever comes – the case continues to hang over the heads of both the young complainant and the accused.

Mafu’s lawyer, Danie Gouws, felt his client had been treated unfairly from the start.

Gouws said at the age of just 19 and with no criminal record, Mafu had been forced to spend two months in custody at the North End Prison before eventually being released on bail of R10,000.

It was alleged that Mafu had raped an 18-year-old woman after a social gathering at a flat in Central in December 2017.

The rugby player maintained that the sex was consensual and the young woman, who had allegedly been drinking and smoking dagga at the time, had falsely accused him of rape because she had stolen his wallet and cellphone.

Gouws said after the allegations were brought to light, Mafu’s contract at the Blue Bulls was affected in that his salary was chopped in half.

“He could not be considered for the Blue Bulls Super Rugby team and as a result of the allegations he also missed out on the U20 world rugby championships in France, where he more than likely would have been selected as captain.”

He said Mafu’s father was forced to resign from his job three years early to cash in his pension to pay the legal fees.

Confident of Mafu’s acquittal and therefore eager to instead proceed to trial, defence advocate Terry Price SC, instructed by Gouws, had argued that the “missing witness” could not take the matter any further.

Price suggested that Van Biljon lead the evidence of the complainant and other witnesses in the meantime.

“In withdrawing the charges when all other witnesses are present at court, we believe the state is conceding that they cannot rely on the complainant’s evidence alone,” Price told Cooney.

In a statement to the police, the teenager had claimed that while she was walking home on the night of December 28 2017, Mafu came from behind, tripped her and dragged her into the bushes.

She alleged he forced her to perform a sexual act on him and raped her more than once.

subscribe

Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.