Chemical attack 100% fabrication – al-Assad

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said a suspected chemical weapons attack was a fabrication to justify a US military strike, as Moscow digs in to defend its ally despite increasing strains with Washington. In an exclusive interview in Damascus – his first since the alleged April 4 attack prompted a US air strike on Syrian forces – al-Assad said his army had given up all its chemical weapons and that Syrian military power was not affected by the US strike.

“Definitely, 100% for us, it’s fabrication,” he said in reference to the alleged chemical weapons attack. “Our impression is that the West, mainly the United States, is hand-in-glove with the terrorists. They fabricated the whole story in order to have a pretext for the attack.”

Western leaders including US President Donald Trump have accused al-Assad of being behind last week’s attack in the rebel-held town Khan Sheikhun, saying his forces had unleashed a chemical weapon during an air strike.

The suspected attack killed at least 87 people, including many children, and images of the dead and suffering victims provoked global outrage. Syria denied any use of chemical weapons and Moscow said the deaths had been the result of a conventional strike hitting a rebel arms depot containing “toxic substances”.

In the interview, al-Assad insisted it was not clear whether an attack on Khan Sheikhun had even happened. “You have a lot of fake videos now,” he said.

“We don’t know whether those dead children were killed in Khan Sheikhun. Were they dead at all?” Al-Assad insisted several times that his forces had turned over all chemical weapons stockpiles in 2013, under a deal brokered by Russia to avoid threatened US military action. “There was no order to make any attack, we don’t have any chemical weapons, we gave up our arsenal a few years ago,” he said.

Al-Assad said his forces had not been diminished by the US strike. “Our firepower, our ability to attack the terrorists hasn’t been affected by this strike.” Denouncing the “barbaric” attack, Trump ordered a strike that saw 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles slam into the airbase in central Syria from which Washington accused al-Assad’s forces of launching the attack.

It was the first direct US military action against al-Assad’s forces since the start of Syria’s civil war six years ago and led to a quick downward spiral in ties between Washington and Moscow.

Russia accused the US of breaking international law with the strike against the Syrian regime, a key ally that Moscow has supported with air strikes since 2015. Trump gave such criticism short shrift on Wednesday, saying: “I felt we had to do something about it. I have absolutely no doubt we did the right thing.”

Standing alongside Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg in Washington, Trump also said it was “certainly possible” that Russia was aware of the suspected attack. “I would like to think that they didn’t know, but certainly they could have. They were there. So we’ll find out,” he said.

The strains in ties were clear as US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson received a frosty reception on a visit to Moscow on Wednesday. “There is a low level of trust between our two countries. The world’s two foremost nuclear powers cannot have this kind of relationship , ” Tillerson said.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov agreed there were many problems, but stressed that Moscow was open to dialogue with the US in all different areas. The polarised positions were evident too at the UN Security Council on Wednesday, when Russia vetoed a Western-drafted resolution that would have required Syrian cooperation in an investigation into the suspected chemical attack.

It was the eighth time that Russia has used its veto power to block action directed at Damascus. China opted to abstain, a move Trump praised. British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said the veto put Russia on the wrong side of the argument, while French President Francois Hollande warned Russia it bears a heavy responsibility for continuing to protect al-Assad. – AFP

Leave a Reply